Adverse events following immunization in children: retrospective analysis of spontaneous reports over a decade.
(2010)
Journal - European journal of clinical pharmacology
Abstract :
PURPOSE: There is no doubt that paediatric immunization prevents serious diseases, but the administration of these vaccines to healthy children also involves risks of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), some of which are potentially serious. The current body of evidence on ADRs from immunization therapy at the population level is partly contradictory across countries, time periods and childhood immunization programmes. The objective of our study was to characterize reported adverse events (AEFIs) following immunization in Danish children. METHODS: Adverse events (AEFIs) in 0- to 17-year-old children and adolescents reported to the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA) between 1998 and 2007 were analysed. The unit of analysis was one AEFI. Data were categorized with respect to time, age, and gender of the children, suspected vaccines, category and seriousness of the AEFIs, and reporting rate. RESULTS: During the study period, the DKMA received 1,365 reports covering 2,600 AEFIs, corresponding to 60% of all adverse events reported for children. One third of the AEFIs were classified as serious, and two deaths were reported. The annual number of serious AEFIs remained constant during the study period. Approximately 80% of AEFIs were reported in children aged 0-2 years. Of all reported AEs, 45% were in the category "general disorders and administration site conditions", followed by the categories "skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders" (20% of total AEFIs) and "nervous system disorders" (16% of total AEFIs). The largest share of serious events was from the category "nervous system disorders" (33% of serious AEFIs). The most frequently reported serious AEs were febrile convulsions, pyrexia, and injection-site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark, a large number of AEFIs following paediatric immunization have been reported, but the majority of cases were non-serious.
Information about ADRs explored by pharmacovigilance approaches: a qualitative review of studies on antibiotics, SSRIs and NSAIDs.
(2009)
Journal - BMC clinical pharmacology (England )
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: Despite surveillance efforts, unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) repeatedly occur after marketing. The aim of this article is to analyse ADRs reported by available ADR signal detection approaches and to explore which information about new and unexpected ADRs these approaches have detected. METHODS: We selected three therapeutic cases for the review: antibiotics for systemic use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAID) and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI). These groups are widely used and represent different therapeutic classes of medicines. The ADR studies were identified through literature search in Medline and Embase. The search was conducted in July 2007. For each therapeutic case, we analysed the time of publication, the strengths of the evidence of safety in the different approaches, reported ADRs and whether the studies have produced new information about ADRs compared to the information available at the time of marketing. RESULTS: 79 studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis: 23 antibiotics studies, 35 NSAID studies, 20 SSRI studies. Studies were mainly published from the end of the 1990s and onwards. Although the drugs were launched in different decades, both analytical and observational approaches to ADR studies were similar for all three therapeutic cases: antibiotics, NSAIDs and SSRIs. The studies primarily dealt with analyses of ADRs of the type A and B and to a lesser extent C and D, cf. Rawlins' classification system. The therapeutic cases provided similar results with regard to detecting information about new ADRs despite different time periods and organs attacked. Approaches ranging higher in the evidence hierarchy provided information about risks of already known or expected ADRs, while information about new and previously unknown ADRs was only detected by case reports, the lowest ranking approach in the evidence hierarchy. CONCLUSION: Although the medicines were launched in different decades, approaches to the ADR studies were similar for all three therapeutic cases: antibiotics, NSAIDs and SSRIs. Both descriptive and analytical designs were applied. Despite the fact that analytical studies rank higher in the evidence hierarchy, only the lower ranking descriptive case reports/spontaneous reports provided information about new and previously undetected ADRs. This review underscores the importance of systems for spontaneous reporting of ADRs. Therefore, spontaneous reporting should be encouraged further and the information in ADR databases should continuously be subjected to systematic analysis.
| ISSN : | 1472-6904 |
|---|
| Mesh Heading : | Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Case-Control Studies Cohort Studies Humans Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors |
|---|
| Mesh Heading Relevant : | Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems adverse effects adverse effects adverse effects |
|---|
Opening the white boxes: the licensing documentation of efficacy and safety of psychotropic medicines for children.
(2009)
Journal - Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety (England )
Abstract :
PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to explore the available evidence in a regulatory agency on the safety and efficacy of two types of psychotropic medicine frequently prescribed to children and adolescents. METHODS: We analysed the documentation in registration files, renewal registration files, summaries of product characteristics and scientific assessment reports in the Danish Medicines Agency for two psychotropic medications prescribed for children: methylphenidate and citalopram to discover what data pertaining to the pediatric population are available to the regulatory agency. RESULTS: The licensing of methylphenidate for treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) in children from the age of six was based on a single-dose crossover study and, a 2-week double blind, parallel group clinical trial in 100 patients from ages 6 to 12 and published literature. Citalopram is not licensed for pediatric use in Denmark. Citalopram was being investigated in three ongoing clinical trials lasting 8-24 weeks in 423 patients aged 7-18 years. The registration files contained no data on the long-term efficacy and safety of citalopram in pediatric use. Registration material also contained information on planned clinical trials with methylphenidate and citalopram among children/adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and citalopram for pediatric use in the Danish Medicine Agency is limited and supports the need for further clinical trials. Medicine prescription for the pediatric population should be monitored in order to identify risks that were not identified at the time of licensing. The results of clinical trials already conducted should be made publicly available.
| ISSN : | 1099-1557 |
|---|
| Mesh Heading : | Adolescent Adult Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity Child Child, Preschool Citalopram Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Licensure Methylphenidate Psychotropic Drugs adverse effects adverse effects adverse effects |
|---|
| Mesh Heading Relevant : | Drug and Narcotic Control drug therapy therapeutic use therapeutic use therapeutic use |
|---|
Information about ADRs explored by pharmacovigilance approaches: a qualitative review of studies on antibiotics, SSRIs and NSAIDs
(2009)
Journal - BMC Clinical Pharmacology
Abstract :
BackgroundDespite surveillance efforts, unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) repeatedly occur after marketing. The aim of this article is to analyse ADRs reported by available ADR signal detection approaches and to explore which information about new and unexpected ADRs these approaches have detected.MethodsWe selected three therapeutic cases for the review: antibiotics for systemic use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAID) and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI). These groups are widely used and represent different therapeutic classes of medicines. The ADR studies were identified through literature search in Medline and Embase. The search was conducted in July 2007. For each therapeutic case, we analysed the time of publication, the strengths of the evidence of safety in the different approaches, reported ADRs and whether the studies have produced new information about ADRs compared to the information available at the time of marketing.Results79 studies were eligible for inclusion in the analysis: 23 antibiotics studies, 35 NSAID studies, 20 SSRI studies. Studies were mainly published from the end of the 1990s and onwards. Although the drugs were launched in different decades, both analytical and observational approaches to ADR studies were similar for all three therapeutic cases: antibiotics, NSAIDs and SSRIs. The studies primarily dealt with analyses of ADRs of the type A and B and to a lesser extent C and D, cf. Rawlins' classification system. The therapeutic cases provided similar results with regard to detecting information about new ADRs despite different time periods and organs attacked. Approaches ranging higher in the evidence hierarchy provided information about risks of already known or expected ADRs, while information about new and previously unknown ADRs was only detected by case reports, the lowest ranking approach in the evidence hierarchy.ConclusionAlthough the medicines were launched in different decades, approaches to the ADR studies were similar for all three therapeutic cases: antibiotics, NSAIDs and SSRIs. Both descriptive and analytical designs were applied. Despite the fact that analytical studies rank higher in the evidence hierarchy, only the lower ranking descriptive case reports/spontaneous reports provided information about new and previously undetected ADRs. This review underscores the importance of systems for spontaneous reporting of ADRs. Therefore, spontaneous reporting should be encouraged further and the information in ADR databases should continuously be subjected to systematic analysis.